Venice Main Page
 
Location Map
 
Design Parameters
 
Shoreline Change Plots
 
Volume Change Plots
 
Hot Spots
 
Performance Table
 
Performance Summary
 
Planform Change Evaluation
 
Project Index

Venice Hot Spots

 
 Ranges DescriptionComments
1995 Report

CT (1995)
116-117South of the inlet and rock revetment. Erosion is due to a deficit of material transport into the fill area as a result of the inlet.
121  23.1 cy/ft of shoreline was eroded due to the protrusion 50-75 feet seaward of a line connecting the shoreline north & south of R-121.   Due to wave refraction, the wave energy is concentrated toward the protruded shoreline.
1997 Report

CT (1997)
121, 125, 128  Protusion of the fill as a result of the configuration of the pre-fill shoreline.
131-133  Erosion may be due to "end-effects" and is expected to occur.
2000 Report

CT (2000)
125  Lost a total of 51.5 cy/ft, the highest in the project (between 9-97 & 9-99).

© 2002 Beaches & Shores Resource Center
Florida State University